14. A Word from the 48%

This was not a unanimous decision by a long shot.

Already the vote has been analysed, divided up into groups most and least likely to vote Leave and Remain.  There’s an idea that the older population has screwed over younger voters, who were far more likely to vote Remain.  We’ve all seen the statistics from the YouGov poll graphic that’s been flying around – but I’d like to point out that I don’t feel the divide like this.

Personally, I feel a total disconnect from the country right now.  That’s not to say I hate anybody or their choice, or I feel that you don’t have the right to your opinion.  Far from it.  I just think we’re separated from one another on a far more fundamental level than our age, or our educational background, or any other factor that’s been cited so far.

We are ideologically different.  We see this country from two completely opposite perspectives – to an extent that it currently feels irreconcilable.  I feel alone not just because we’re unpinning ourselves from the EU, but because a slim majority of the electorate I am part of doesn’t share my view that in our current time of crisis, nothing is more important than unity.

Now, full disclosure, and I’m sure I don’t speak for many Remain voters here – but I have never really considered myself a patriot in the traditional sense.  I would not support this country through any decision it makes or any path it walks; I do not support it now.  I don’t think the UK is the greatest country in the world because I don’t believe there is one – and I’m not comfortable casually saying that there is for the sake of encouraging some kind of synthetic national pride.

That’s not to say I don’t like this country.  I do.  When at its best, I think the UK is creative, academic, funny, strange and wonderful – a hotbed for ideas both sensible and sensational.  But so are many other places, and the UK is far from its best right now.  I think, like many other people outside of the United Kingdom, that this is a country that fuels its inflated sense of importance with the ghost of our Victorian-era power.  Our economy is internationally significant in that it is large; pre-Brexit, we were the fifth largest economy in the world.  However, to mistake that for individual power would be – and has been – a monumental mistake.

The stock market and Sterling crashes overnight may be based on panic, but they do show that the world’s instinct is that an error has been made.  It does not presently have confidence in the UK as a single unit.  And why should it?

With its vast Empire-era power, the United Kingdom destabilised many countries for short-term financial gain – and let’s reiterate that our economic strength and development came from the ransacking of these countries.  By modern standards, this would be unquestionably unethical.  Our gain from this was not just economic or political, either; people from across the Empire fought alongside us in both wars.

Let’s talk more about war.  Terrified of Hitler after the devastation of the First World War – then the Great War, as we hoped it would never be replicated – the UK cowered until it could cower no longer, and then only won the Second World War with help from other large powers around the world.  Even then, it was weeks away from losing the war, brought to its knees financially and emotionally by six years of conflict.

After the Second World War, the country’s economic position was dire.  American money saved the UK, but its position and its dignity were shattered; in fact, the last repayment on these huge loans was only made in 2006.  Let’s not forget that the UK also received by far the biggest amount in Marshall Aid – cumulatively, 3,297 million dollars.  To put that into perspective, the next largest recipient (France) received 2,296 million.

There is no shame in taking aid when it’s needed, but my point is that the UK did need it.  By modern standards, the United Kingdom has never been, and will never be, independently successful.  Especially now, when it can – thank goodness – no longer rely on sticking other countries up for resources, ideas and monopolised trade, it has no means to establish itself as a world power.  In order to maintain the standard of economic growth the country wants, that is what it would need to do to replace the international heft of the European Union.

I am not convinced by the ‘Make Britain Great Again’ rhetoric, and nor is the rest of the world.  Because of that, I now feel like an outsider looking in on my own country – but that’s based on far more than just this view of the UK’s potential on its own.

It just feels intrinsically selfish.  Both the Leave and Remain camps were arguing solely on the basis of what’s best for the UK, and I can understand that – but equally, I care about what’s going on in the rest of the world too.  Surely, that’s more important?  After all, it’s no joke or exaggeration to say that we are on the precipice of dark, dark times.  Terrorism, fear, displacement, aggression and xenophobia are rife.  We created the European Union after the uncharted horrors of World War II, determined to stand together in future – come what may.

That war wasn’t all that long ago.  People who lived through it are still alive.  It may seem that peace in Europe is a given now, but it would be a mistake for us to make an assumption like that.  The consequences are too much.

The UK has just made a very loud and public statement that it does not stand with the EU – that it thinks it can stand on its own.  More’s the point – it wants to.  The anti-immigrant rhetoric, and the scaremongering about Syrian refugees, add fuel to the fire which Daesh uses to radicalise young people.  They don’t care about you.  They hate us.  We have to do this for ourselves.  It also leaves countries struggling in the Eurozone out to dry, where people’s standard of living is so much worse than a crowded NHS waiting room or a classroom in which there are children who speak a number of different languages.  It lets other countries know that it’s okay to pull out of the EU’s human rights and employment protection policies and set your own.

Whether you believe the Tories will replace those policies or not is moot.  The message that sends to other countries is frightening and irresponsible.  If we’re allowed the responsibility of deciding what human rights are to us, why shouldn’t they?  And in a world where in places, women are still jailed for being raped, people are killed for espousing their religious views or lack thereof and it’s legal to execute someone for being gay, this is a dangerous precedent to set.

The truth is that we do not always need to govern ourselves.  Seriously.  It’s okay.  Some things are more important than that.  It’s okay to hand over control to a council of people who are trying to orchestrate better circumstances for everyone – not just themselves.  That might occasionally result in a loss for the UK, but for goodness’ sake.  Can’t the UK see how lucky it is?  It was, after all, one of the top contributors to the EU for a reason.  It could afford to be.

Sometimes other people’s betterment is more important than our own.  In my view, international diplomacy, security, communication, cooperation and compromise are all worth more than total control.

I believe that Brexit will have catastrophic economic consequences, and I believe many or all of the promises made by Leave will never come to fruition.  However, that’s not what this is about, and I won’t elaborate on that.  That’s not the reason I’m hurting and disappointed.  If the country suffers, then it suffers; there is nothing we can do about it now.

I’m disappointed because this was a decision made on the wrong terms, and – it seems – for the wrong reasons.  I’m disappointed for the sake of unity and solidarity.  And as our exit approaches, I can only hope our inflated national pride does not take the rest of the EU down with it.

Es lebe Europa.  Je suis désolé. Tack så mycket.  Adios y buena suerte.

4 Comments

  1. I think a lot of what you said was unbiased and I loved reading that as it’s been a very aggressive response from both sides after the release of the result.
    My view is that being out of the EU we can make other partnerships with other countries and thus building stronger friendships which I believe is better in the long run.

    I didn’t like the reasons to why the EU was set up. It has provided many benefits but it was leading towards it’s original plan of aiming to create a United States of Europe scenario which I believe would of led to the next World War which with the technological strength and power of the major armed forces in the world would not be a very nice sight.

    My belief towards Brexit. Change is always necessary to grow.

    Like

    Reply

    1. It certainly has been pretty aggressive on both sides. Clearly, everyone’s emotions are running pretty high! I kind of feel it, though. There’s a lot of panic.

      For my part, I suppose I don’t understand why any other countries would a) have held off on giving the UK better trading deals purely because of its position in the EU, which actually strengthens and diversifies its economy and our market – hence why people fear that international corps will move their European headquarters out of London, and b) why those deals will be better on the basis that the UK has a more poorly connected economy. Already the UK has dropped from 5th largest world economy to 6th, and that’s just in a matter of days. I can’t imagine this will encourage international trade.

      After all, people want the biggest markets for their goods. If the UK does go into heavy recession as predicted, then it will not have the upper hand in these renegotiations with other countries either.

      I don’t know. I totally agree that change is necessary for growth, but I felt it was a framework we could at least work with and continue to contribute to. Now we’re on our own, and we’re not going anywhere; we’re going to have to keep working with Europe, like getting divorced from someone you work with at a job you can’t quit. It’s going to suck for both fo us, and there’ll probably be a little vitriol, even if everybody claims there isn’t!

      Like

      Reply

      1. I think it is because of the EU fundamental aims of trying to become a United States of Europe.
        Yes, we didn’t know if this was going to happen but with the proposed changes to the Lisbon Act this is definitely the way they are wanting to go. There is a massive reason why the big EU countries are kicking up a fuss currently about us needing to leave asap as the new proposed Lisbon Act amendments cannot be put into place until the UK enacts Article 50. It’s important as other countries have speculated that they also want a referendum to leave the EU and this will cause the fall of the EU.

        Our economy will recover, it was always gonna take a hit after a decision but it’s already starting to rebuild itself as we had contingency plans in place.

        This decision had changed the world as it shows that people have the power to make change and doesn’t necessarily mean that only the big guys get what they want all the time.
        The country is in chaos at the moment but I think going against the public’s word would be political suicide and I think we would have a massive uprising tbh.
        I think we made the right decision on the leave and can build a better economy in the long run. Best example is look at Switzerland. Not in the EU, trades with the EU has a strong economy, high wages ect.
        Something we can look up to I feel.

        Like

  2. Hi Sam – that’s brilliant. I didn’t understand all of it. But you did explain things clearly that I hadn’t thought about.

    Like

    Reply

Leave a comment